Verification
Nerve Recovery Max batch verify: lot NRM-26/MY-1150, and what a string is not
Two reference strings were supplied with this stock: lot NRM-26/MY-1150 and certificate NRM-1150-26-MY. Both are label values, and no certificate of analysis document reached this desk: no laboratory, no assay, no date, no signature. A lot code proves two narrow things. It shows that two bottles carrying the same code came from one production run, and it tells you which document to ask for. It cannot show what is in the capsule or that anything was tested. Five checks need no equipment at all: the capsule count, which the panel puts at 60; the vitamin B6 line, printed as 1.7 mcg beside 100% of the Daily Value; the folate line, which is exactly right; the footnote; and the Distributed By block. The order desk on +1 (302) 200-3480 can be asked for a certificate before you pay.
By the Mynerverecoverymax Editorial Desk · Last updated October 12, 2026
The batch, in under a minute
Read time under a minute- Two reference strings were supplied: lot NRM-26/MY-1150 and certificate NRM-1150-26-MY. Both are label values.
- No certificate of analysis document reached this desk. No laboratory, no assay, no date and no signature.
- A reference string is not a document, so this site does not describe Nerve Recovery Max as tested or verified anywhere.
- Five checks need no equipment: the capsule count, the vitamin B6 line, the folate line, the footnote and the Distributed By block.
Two reference strings, and what they are
Two values arrived with this stock: a lot reference reading NRM-26/MY-1150 and a certificate reference reading NRM-1150-26-MY. Both are strings on a page. Neither is a document.
| The item | As supplied | Status | What is actually known |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lot reference | NRM-26/MY-1150 | A string supplied with this stock | Supplied as a label value. No document came with it |
| Certificate reference | NRM-1150-26-MY | A string supplied with this stock | Supplied as a label value. No document came with it |
| A certificate of analysis document | not published | Nothing reached this desk | No file, no scan, no laboratory name, no assay, no date, no signature |
| A laboratory name | not published | Not supplied | No testing house, accreditation or scope of testing was named |
| A public lot lookup | not published | Not supplied | No index, portal or reference service was named for either string |
| A best-before date | not published | Not in the supplied artwork | No expiry or best-before figure appears in anything supplied here |
The distinction is not pedantry. A lot number identifies a production run. A certificate of analysis is a laboratory’s report on what that run contained. The first is a filing reference, the second is evidence, and only one of the two arrived.
So this site does not describe Nerve Recovery Max as tested, verified or batch-checked anywhere, and does not print either string as though it settled something. A lot code and a certificate reference were supplied as strings. No document was.
What a certificate would say about this panel
A certificate of analysis has a narrow job: it names a lot and reports what a laboratory measured in it. On this product the measurements that would matter are unusually specific, because the panel has already named every one of them.
What it names
A lot. A document that does not name the lot on your bottle is about somebody else’s bottle.
What it reports
What a named laboratory measured, by which method, on which date, signed.
What it is not
A seal, a roundel, a reference string or a marketing claim. A seal is artwork, not a certificate: no certifying body, certificate number or audit date was supplied for any of the marks shown with this stock.
The panel on this bottle declares ten things and gives every one of them its own printed amount. There is no proprietary blend on it. That is rarer than it should be, and it is said first on every page of this site that touches the subject. That is what makes a certificate so much more useful here than on most labels. An assay would not have to resolve a proprietary blend into parts, because there is no blend: it would simply confirm or contradict ten printed figures, one at a time.
It would also settle the one line on this panel that cannot be right. Vitamin B6 (as Pyridoxine hydrochloride) is printed at 1.7 mcg beside 100% of the Daily Value, and an assay would say which half of that line the capsule actually matches. Testing and quality sets out what did and did not come with this stock.
10 amounts, printed, with no proprietary blend. A serving is 2 capsules and the bottle holds 30 of them.
- 10 amounts printed, none in a blend
- 2 capsules a serving, 30 servings a bottle
- Price and terms shown at checkout, before you pay
What a lot code can and cannot prove
The honest version of this page is a two-column answer, and the useful column is the shorter one.
| Side | The claim | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Can prove | That two bottles came from the same run | Two bottles carrying the same lot share a production run, which matters when something differs between them. |
| Can prove | Which document to ask for | A certificate of analysis names a lot. The lot on your bottle is how you tell whether a document is about the product in your hand. |
| Cannot prove | What is in the capsule | A code is an identifier. It carries no assay, no purity figure and no weight. |
| Cannot prove | That anything was tested | A reference string is a filing reference. A lot code and a certificate reference were supplied as strings. No document was. |
| Cannot prove | That the printed amounts are the amounts inside | That is what a laboratory report settles, and none was supplied. On this label it would settle ten separate figures. |
Both halves matter. A buyer who reads a printed lot code as proof of testing has been misled by a convention: codes appear on tested and untested products alike and look identical. A buyer who dismisses the code loses the one thing it is good for.
No published trial on the finished Nerve Recovery Max formula was supplied with this stock and none appears in any source this desk opened. Every reference on this site describes a single named ingredient, a category of ingredients, or a labelling regulation. That is a different thing from testing this capsule.
Five checks that need no equipment
Nothing here depends on a laboratory, a certificate or a desk. All five are printed on the bottle in your hand and can be held against the transcription this site publishes.
| The check | What is printed | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| The capsule count | 60 | The panel declares 30 servings of 2 Capsules, which multiply to 60 capsules. |
| The vitamin B6 line | 1.7 mcg, 100% | The printed unit and the printed percentage cannot both be true. The label page prints the arithmetic. |
| The folate line | 383 mcg DFE (230 mcg folic acid) | This one is right. 230 mcg of folic acid divided by the 0.6 factor the regulation publishes is 383.33, printed as 383. |
| The footnote | “** Daily Value (DV) not established.” | It belongs to the six lines with a weight and no percentage, which is the convention the regulation asks for. |
| The Distributed By block | Nerve Recovery Max, Akron, OH 44301 | Printed with the number (888) 869-0440. Not this retailer and not the order desk. |
The middle two rows are the whole argument of this site in two lines. The folate line is correct on form and on arithmetic, and it is published as correct. The vitamin B6 line beside it is printed in micrograms where 21 CFR 101.9(c)(8)(iv) sets the unit at milligrams: “Vitamin B6 | Milligrams (mg) | 1.7” 21 CFR 101.9 And 21 CFR 101.36(b)(2)(ii)(B) binds a Supplement Facts panel to that table “using the units of measurement and the levels of significance given in § 101.9(c)(8)(iv)” 21 CFR 101.36
Three of the four vitamin percentages recompute exactly, which is what makes the fourth a typo rather than a convention. If the bottle in your hand prints something different from the transcription here, [email protected] is the email worth sending.
What would change this page
Two documents would rewrite most of it, and neither is exotic. Both exist for products that have them.
- A certificate of analysis naming lot NRM-26/MY-1150, with a laboratory, a method, a date and a signature.
- An assay on the four vitamin lines, which would say which half of the vitamin B6 line the capsule matches.
- An extract ratio or a standardisation figure for the three botanical powders. No extract ratio, marker compound or standardisation percentage is printed for the ashwagandha, the broccoli or the turmeric.
- A published trial on the finished formula rather than on single ingredients.
- A manufacturer, a facility or a registration number. The bottle names a distributor in Akron, Ohio. No manufacturer, facility or registration number is named anywhere.
- A best-before date, which appears in nothing supplied with this stock.
Until one arrives, this page says what it says. If either does, write to [email protected] with the page and the line. The about page is the method, and +1 (302) 200-3480 can be asked for a certificate before you pay.
Ask the order desk for the certificate before you buy
The desk on +1 (302) 200-3480 can be asked for the certificate covering a specific lot. No price and no guarantee term is published here; the checkout prints both.
Read the terms on the seller’s page
- 10 amounts printed, none in a blend
- 2 capsules a serving, 30 servings a bottle
- Price and terms shown at checkout, before you pay
Questions
Nerve Recovery Max batch verify: common questions
Does Nerve Recovery Max have a certificate of analysis?
How do I check a Nerve Recovery Max lot number?
Where is the lot number on the Nerve Recovery Max bottle?
How do I verify a supplement lot number in general?
What can I check on the Nerve Recovery Max bottle myself?
References
- Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Section 101.9. Nutrition labeling of food. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2024-title21-vol2/xml/CFR-2024-title21-vol2-sec101-9.xml
- Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Section 101.36. Nutrition labeling of dietary supplements. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2024-title21-vol2/xml/CFR-2024-title21-vol2-sec101-36.xml
Every source above was opened and read on October 12, 2026. None of them tested Nerve Recovery Max itself. They describe the labelling regulations that govern this panel, which is a different thing from testing this finished formula.